Golden set is not the best rule, but the rules that have been before golden set caused second match less exciting.
Year by year there are more and more discussions about that rule which seems to be unfair.
There's a rule that can solve this problem. A normal point counting: 3:0, 3:1- 3 points. 3:2- winner- 2 points, loser- 1 point. And the golden set played only with a tie.
I would cause second match more exciting (only with 3:1 or 3:0 in the first match and 2:0 in sets in second the match would be settled). And also it would be more fair- only after a tie would be a golden set.
Year by year there are more and more discussions about that rule which seems to be unfair.
There's a rule that can solve this problem. A normal point counting: 3:0, 3:1- 3 points. 3:2- winner- 2 points, loser- 1 point. And the golden set played only with a tie.
I would cause second match more exciting (only with 3:1 or 3:0 in the first match and 2:0 in sets in second the match would be settled). And also it would be more fair- only after a tie would be a golden set.
5 -5 set ... the golden set start from 0-0
5-4 set....the golden set start from 2-0
5-3 set...the golden set start from 4-0
or better... if we can play 3 games ...2 of 3... it's the best rule we can have
1st Match: Dynamo 3:2 Trentino
2nd Match: Trento 3:0 Dynamo
GS: Dynamo 15:12 Trentino
In my opinion this is unfair...
And for this level of players, playing 5 sets + a 25 points golden set won't be that much of a problem (they won't be too much exausted)
Yes, it would be the most fair solution, but very often the second matches weren't so exciting. For example: Resovia-Trentino. After a tight first set won by Trentino everything was clear.
The solution with point counting is more fair than golden set and more exciting that the set counting rule.
golden set is not good if win/lose set are different? maybe.. but there's an "IF"
and IF "team A" win every matches with 3-2 and the "team B" reach the final match with all 3-0 and lost the final match 2-3 is correct? the set difference are in favor of the team B
if u really want give the title to the most deserving team you should have just an european season whit everyone VS everyone, with no pool, no playoff, no finalfour
You've mentioned very important thing. Every time I said unfair I ment more random.
I think that the competition without randomness can be boring (for example very long sets to 50 points). Yes- the golden set is rather random, but it is something like extra-time (you know). In my opinion it should be played only in case of the tie in the points. It'll be more fair (less random) in the case of play-off.
PS. I don't think that Dinamo cheated. They've just had more luck.