Edit

Photo by F…M

Sue Woodstra

Edit wallpaper

Wallpaper added by Airton Neto

It's me Delete Share

Timeline1
Clubs10
Teammates32
Tournaments60
Matches47
Awards0

Coach data

Edit

Player ranking: 2749
Coach ranking: 1032
Nationality: USA
Position: Outside Hitter
Birthdate: 1957-05-21
Height: 175cm
Weight: 68kg
Views: 1397
Added by: F…M

Social profiles

Edit

Family

Add

Settings

Finished player career

Would you like to help the project?Translate Volleybox

Staff member tournaments

Medals

National teams tournaments

The Olympics (Women)

1

2008

FIVB World Cup (Women)

1

2007

NORCECA Championships (Women)

1

2007

Pan American Games (Women)

1

2007

Clubs tournaments

German Bundesliga (Women)

1

1993/94

Challenge Cup (Women)

1

1993/94

German Cup (Women)

1

1993/94

NCAA - Pac-12 Conference (Women)

1

1986/87

NCAA - Big East Conference (Women)

3

1992/93, 1991/92, 1990/91

NCAA - Horizon League (Women)

1

1994/95

NCAA - Atlantic Coast Conference (Women)

1

2001/02

2012/13

NCAA II - California Collegiate Athletic Association 2012/13 with Cal Poly Humboldt Univ. 0.22 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA II - California Collegiate Athletic Association has rank 0.10 ratio for 12th place is 2.20, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.10 x 2.20 x 1.00 = 0.22 points

2011/12

NCAA II - California Collegiate Athletic Association 2011/12 with Cal Poly Humboldt Univ. 0.24 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA II - California Collegiate Athletic Association has rank 0.10 ratio for 11th place is 2.40, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.10 x 2.40 x 1.00 = 0.24 points

2010/11

NCAA II - California Collegiate Athletic Association 2010/11 with Cal Poly Humboldt Univ. 0.22 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA II - California Collegiate Athletic Association has rank 0.10 ratio for 12th place is 2.20, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.10 x 2.20 x 1.00 = 0.22 points

2009/10

NCAA II - California Collegiate Athletic Association 2009/10 with Cal Poly Humboldt Univ. 0.24 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA II - California Collegiate Athletic Association has rank 0.10 ratio for 11th place is 2.40, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.10 x 2.40 x 1.00 = 0.24 points

2008/09

NCAA II - California Collegiate Athletic Association 2008/09 with Cal Poly Humboldt Univ. 0.36 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA II - California Collegiate Athletic Association has rank 0.10 ratio for 7th place is 3.60, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.10 x 3.60 x 1.00 = 0.36 points

2007/08

Dubai Cup 2008 with USA 3.00 points to ranking

Tournament Dubai Cup has rank 1.00 ratio for 6th place is 4.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 4.00 x 0.75 = 3.00 points

Pan American Cup 2008 with USA 15.19 points to ranking

Tournament Pan American Cup has rank 4.50 ratio for 5th place is 4.50, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 4.50 x 4.50 x 0.75 = 15.19 points

World Grand Prix 2008 with USA 22.50 points to ranking

Tournament World Grand Prix has rank 6.00 ratio for 4th place is 5.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 6.00 x 5.00 x 0.75 = 22.50 points

The Olympics 2008 with USA 90.00 points to ranking

Tournament The Olympics has rank 15.00 ratio for 2nd place is 8.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 15.00 x 8.00 x 0.75 = 90.00 points

2006/07

NCAA II - California Collegiate Athletic Association 2006/07 with Cal Poly Humboldt Univ. 0.29 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA II - California Collegiate Athletic Association has rank 0.10 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.10 x 2.90 x 1.00 = 0.29 points

Pan American Cup 2007 with USA 16.88 points to ranking

Tournament Pan American Cup has rank 4.50 ratio for 4th place is 5.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 4.50 x 5.00 x 0.75 = 16.88 points

Pan American Games 2007 with USA 27.00 points to ranking

Tournament Pan American Games has rank 6.00 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 6.00 x 6.00 x 0.75 = 27.00 points

World Grand Prix 2007 with USA 14.40 points to ranking

Tournament World Grand Prix has rank 6.00 ratio for 8th place is 3.20, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 6.00 x 3.20 x 0.75 = 14.40 points

NORCECA Championships 2007 with USA 36.00 points to ranking

Tournament NORCECA Championships has rank 6.00 ratio for 2nd place is 8.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 6.00 x 8.00 x 0.75 = 36.00 points

FIVB World Cup 2007 with USA 40.50 points to ranking

Tournament FIVB World Cup has rank 9.00 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 9.00 x 6.00 x 0.75 = 40.50 points

2005/06

NCAA II - Great Northwest Athletic Conference 2005/06 with Cal Poly Humboldt Univ.

2004/05

NCAA II - Great Northwest Athletic Conference 2004/05 with Cal Poly Humboldt Univ.

2003/04

NCAA II - Great Northwest Athletic Conference 2003/04 with Cal Poly Humboldt Univ.

2002/03

NCAA II - Great Northwest Athletic Conference 2002/03 with Cal Poly Humboldt Univ.

2001/02

NCAA - Atlantic Coast Conference 2001/02 with Florida State Univ. 1.50 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Atlantic Coast Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 2nd place is 8.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 0.25 x 8.00 x 0.75 = 1.50 points

2000/01

NCAA - Atlantic Coast Conference 2000/01 with Florida State Univ. 0.75 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Atlantic Coast Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 6th place is 4.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 0.25 x 4.00 x 0.75 = 0.75 points

1999/00

NCAA - Atlantic Coast Conference 1999/00 with Florida State Univ. 0.54 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Atlantic Coast Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 0.25 x 2.90 x 0.75 = 0.54 points

1998/99

NCAA - Pac-12 Conference 1998/99 with California Univ. 1.95 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Pac-12 Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 10th place is 2.60, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 2.60 x 0.75 = 1.95 points

1997/98

NCAA - Pac-12 Conference 1997/98 with California Univ. 2.18 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Pac-12 Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 2.90 x 0.75 = 2.18 points

1996/97

NCAA - Pac-12 Conference 1996/97 with California Univ. 1.95 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Pac-12 Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 10th place is 2.60, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 2.60 x 0.75 = 1.95 points

1995/96

NCAA - Pac-12 Conference 1995/96 with California Univ. 2.18 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Pac-12 Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 2.90 x 0.75 = 2.18 points

1994/95

NCAA 1994/95 with Notre Dame Univ. 6.53 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 2.90 x 0.75 = 6.53 points

NCAA - Horizon League 1994/95 with Notre Dame Univ. 1.88 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Horizon League has rank 0.25 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 0.25 x 10.00 x 0.75 = 1.88 points

1993/94

German Cup 1993/94 with USC Münster 20.00 points to ranking

Tournament German Cup has rank 2.50 ratio for 2nd place is 8.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.50 x 8.00 x 1.00 = 20.00 points

German Bundesliga 1993/94 with USC Münster 24.00 points to ranking

Tournament German Bundesliga has rank 4.00 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 4.00 x 6.00 x 1.00 = 24.00 points

Challenge Cup 1993/94 with USC Münster 30.00 points to ranking

Tournament Challenge Cup has rank 3.00 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 10.00 x 1.00 = 30.00 points

1992/93

NCAA - Big East Conference 1992/93 with Pittsburgh Univ. 3.75 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big East Conference has rank 0.50 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 0.50 x 10.00 x 0.75 = 3.75 points

NCAA 1992/93 with Pittsburgh Univ. 3.15 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 0.75 = 3.15 points

1991/92

NCAA - Big East Conference 1991/92 with Pittsburgh Univ. 3.75 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big East Conference has rank 0.50 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 0.50 x 10.00 x 0.75 = 3.75 points

NCAA 1991/92 with Pittsburgh Univ. 3.15 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 0.75 = 3.15 points

1990/91

NCAA - Big East Conference 1990/91 with Pittsburgh Univ. 3.75 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big East Conference has rank 0.50 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 0.50 x 10.00 x 0.75 = 3.75 points

NCAA 1990/91 with Pittsburgh Univ. 6.53 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 2.90 x 0.75 = 6.53 points

1988/89

NCAA - Pac-12 Conference 1988/89 with Arizona State Univ. 3.00 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Pac-12 Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 6th place is 4.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 4.00 x 0.75 = 3.00 points

NCAA 1988/89 with Arizona State Univ. 3.15 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 0.75 = 3.15 points

1987/88

NCAA 1987/88 with Arizona State Univ. 3.15 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 0.75 = 3.15 points

NCAA - Pac-12 Conference 1987/88 with Arizona State Univ. 2.70 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Pac-12 Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 7th place is 3.60, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 3.60 x 0.75 = 2.70 points

1986/87

NCAA - Pac-12 Conference 1986/87 with Arizona State Univ. 4.50 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Pac-12 Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 6.00 x 0.75 = 4.50 points

NCAA 1986/87 with Arizona State Univ. 6.53 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 2.90 x 0.75 = 6.53 points

1985/86

NCAA 1985/86 with Arizona State Univ. 3.15 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 0.75 = 3.15 points

Player tournaments

Medals

National teams tournaments

The Olympics

1

1984

World Championships

1

1982

NORCECA Championships

1

1979

Clubs tournaments

Japan SV.LEAGUE

1

1987/88

1

1986/87

2

1985/86, 1984/85

Kurowashiki Tournament

2

1986/87, 1984/85

2

1987/88, 1985/86

AIAW National Championship

1

1977/78

1988/89

Japan SV.LEAGUE 1988/89 with NEC 20.00 points to ranking

Tournament Japan SV.LEAGUE has rank 4.00 ratio for 4th place is 5.00, so 4.00 x 5.00 = 20.00 points

Kurowashiki Tournament 1988/89 with NEC 4.50 points to ranking

Tournament Kurowashiki Tournament has rank 1.00 ratio for 5th place is 4.50, so 1.00 x 4.50 = 4.50 points

1987/88

Japan SV.LEAGUE 1987/88 with NEC 40.00 points to ranking

Tournament Japan SV.LEAGUE has rank 4.00 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, so 4.00 x 10.00 = 40.00 points

Kurowashiki Tournament 1987/88 with NEC 6.00 points to ranking

Tournament Kurowashiki Tournament has rank 1.00 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, so 1.00 x 6.00 = 6.00 points

1986/87

Japan SV.LEAGUE 1986/87 with NEC 32.00 points to ranking

Tournament Japan SV.LEAGUE has rank 4.00 ratio for 2nd place is 8.00, so 4.00 x 8.00 = 32.00 points

Kurowashiki Tournament 1986/87 with NEC 8.00 points to ranking

Tournament Kurowashiki Tournament has rank 1.00 ratio for 2nd place is 8.00, so 1.00 x 8.00 = 8.00 points

1985/86

Japan SV.LEAGUE 1985/86 with NEC 24.00 points to ranking

Tournament Japan SV.LEAGUE has rank 4.00 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, so 4.00 x 6.00 = 24.00 points

Kurowashiki Tournament 1985/86 with NEC 6.00 points to ranking

Tournament Kurowashiki Tournament has rank 1.00 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, so 1.00 x 6.00 = 6.00 points

1984/85

Japan SV.LEAGUE 1984/85 with NEC 24.00 points to ranking

Tournament Japan SV.LEAGUE has rank 4.00 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, so 4.00 x 6.00 = 24.00 points

Kurowashiki Tournament 1984/85 with NEC 8.00 points to ranking

Tournament Kurowashiki Tournament has rank 1.00 ratio for 2nd place is 8.00, so 1.00 x 8.00 = 8.00 points

1983/84

The Olympics 1984 with USA 120.00 points to ranking

Tournament The Olympics has rank 15.00 ratio for 2nd place is 8.00, so 15.00 x 8.00 = 120.00 points

1981/82

World Championships 1982 with USA 54.00 points to ranking

Tournament World Championships has rank 9.00 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, so 9.00 x 6.00 = 54.00 points

1980/81

FIVB World Cup 1981 with USA 45.00 points to ranking

Tournament FIVB World Cup has rank 9.00 ratio for 4th place is 5.00, so 9.00 x 5.00 = 45.00 points

1978/79

NORCECA Championships 1979 with USA 48.00 points to ranking

Tournament NORCECA Championships has rank 6.00 ratio for 2nd place is 8.00, so 6.00 x 8.00 = 48.00 points

1977/78

AIAW National Championship 1977/78 with USC 2.00 points to ranking

Tournament AIAW National Championship has rank 0.20 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, so 0.20 x 10.00 = 2.00 points

World Championships 1978 with USA 40.50 points to ranking

Tournament World Championships has rank 9.00 ratio for 5th place is 4.50, so 9.00 x 4.50 = 40.50 points

Are you Sue Woodstra?

Take over the profile

0