Edit

Photo by slintyen

Cathy George

Edit wallpaper

Wallpaper added by slintyen

It's me Delete Share

Timeline0
Clubs5
Teammates64
Tournaments49
Matches45

Coach data

Edit

Ranking: 1744
Nationality: USA
Views: 1422
Added by: slintyen

Social profiles

Edit

Family

Add

Are you looking for a new volleyball club?Get job offers

Medals

Clubs tournaments

NCAA (Women)

1

1989/90

NCAA II (Women)

1

1988/89

NCAA - Southland Conference (Women)

3

1992/93, 1990/91, 1989/90

1

1991/92

NCAA - Mid-American Conference (Women)

1

2000/01

1

1999/00

2023/24

USA Pro Volleyball Federation 2023/24 with Grand Rapids Rise

2021/22

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2021/22 with Michigan State Univ. 4.80 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 11th place is 2.40, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 2.40 x 1.00 = 4.80 points

2020/21

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2020/21 with Michigan State Univ. 3.60 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 14th place is 1.80, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 1.80 x 1.00 = 3.60 points

2019/20

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2019/20 with Michigan State Univ. 5.80 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 2.90 x 1.00 = 5.80 points

2018/19

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2018/19 with Michigan State Univ. 4.40 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 12th place is 2.20, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 2.20 x 1.00 = 4.40 points

2017/18

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2017/18 with Michigan State Univ. 10.00 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 4th place is 5.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 5.00 x 1.00 = 10.00 points

NCAA 2017/18 with Michigan State Univ. 13.50 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 5th place is 4.50, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 4.50 x 1.00 = 13.50 points

2016/17

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2016/17 with Michigan State Univ. 9.00 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 5th place is 4.50, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 4.50 x 1.00 = 9.00 points

NCAA 2016/17 with Michigan State Univ. 4.20 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 1.00 = 4.20 points

2015/16

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2015/16 with Michigan State Univ. 6.40 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 8th place is 3.20, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 3.20 x 1.00 = 6.40 points

NCAA 2015/16 with Michigan State Univ. 4.20 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 1.00 = 4.20 points

2014/15

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2014/15 with Michigan State Univ. 7.20 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 7th place is 3.60, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 3.60 x 1.00 = 7.20 points

NCAA 2014/15 with Michigan State Univ. 4.20 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 1.00 = 4.20 points

2013/14

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2013/14 with Michigan State Univ. 7.20 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 7th place is 3.60, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 3.60 x 1.00 = 7.20 points

NCAA 2013/14 with Michigan State Univ. 8.70 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 2.90 x 1.00 = 8.70 points

2012/13

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2012/13 with Michigan State Univ. 8.00 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 6th place is 4.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 4.00 x 1.00 = 8.00 points

NCAA 2012/13 with Michigan State Univ. 8.70 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 2.90 x 1.00 = 8.70 points

2011/12

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2011/12 with Michigan State Univ. 8.00 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 6th place is 4.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 4.00 x 1.00 = 8.00 points

NCAA 2011/12 with Michigan State Univ. 4.20 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 1.00 = 4.20 points

2010/11

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2010/11 with Michigan State Univ. 5.80 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 2.90 x 1.00 = 5.80 points

2009/10

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2009/10 with Michigan State Univ. 5.20 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 10th place is 2.60, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 2.60 x 1.00 = 5.20 points

NCAA 2009/10 with Michigan State Univ. 0.21 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 33th place is 0.07, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 0.07 x 1.00 = 0.21 points

2008/09

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2008/09 with Michigan State Univ. 6.40 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 8th place is 3.20, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 3.20 x 1.00 = 6.40 points

2007/08

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2007/08 with Michigan State Univ. 8.00 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 6th place is 4.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 4.00 x 1.00 = 8.00 points

NCAA 2007/08 with Michigan State Univ. 8.70 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 2.90 x 1.00 = 8.70 points

2006/07

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2006/07 with Michigan State Univ. 8.00 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 6th place is 4.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 4.00 x 1.00 = 8.00 points

NCAA 2006/07 with Michigan State Univ. 0.21 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 33th place is 0.07, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 0.07 x 1.00 = 0.21 points

2005/06

NCAA - Big Ten Conference 2005/06 with Michigan State Univ. 5.80 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Big Ten Conference has rank 2.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 2.00 x 2.90 x 1.00 = 5.80 points

2004/05

NCAA - Mid-American Conference 2004/05 with Western Michigan Univ. 1.25 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Mid-American Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 4th place is 5.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 5.00 x 1.00 = 1.25 points

2003/04

NCAA - Mid-American Conference 2003/04 with Western Michigan Univ. 0.80 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Mid-American Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 8th place is 3.20, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 3.20 x 1.00 = 0.80 points

2002/03

NCAA - Mid-American Conference 2002/03 with Western Michigan Univ. 0.90 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Mid-American Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 7th place is 3.60, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 3.60 x 1.00 = 0.90 points

2001/02

NCAA - Mid-American Conference 2001/02 with Western Michigan Univ. 0.80 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Mid-American Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 8th place is 3.20, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 3.20 x 1.00 = 0.80 points

2000/01

NCAA - Mid-American Conference 2000/01 with Western Michigan Univ. 2.50 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Mid-American Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 10.00 x 1.00 = 2.50 points

NCAA 2000/01 with Western Michigan Univ. 0.21 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 33th place is 0.07, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 0.07 x 1.00 = 0.21 points

1999/00

NCAA - Mid-American Conference 1999/00 with Western Michigan Univ. 1.50 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Mid-American Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 6.00 x 1.00 = 1.50 points

1998/99

NCAA - Mid-American Conference 1998/99 with Western Michigan Univ. 1.00 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Mid-American Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 6th place is 4.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 4.00 x 1.00 = 1.00 points

1997/98

NCAA - Mid-American Conference 1997/98 with Western Michigan Univ. 1.13 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Mid-American Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 5th place is 4.50, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 4.50 x 1.00 = 1.13 points

1996/97

NCAA - Mid-American Conference 1996/97 with Western Michigan Univ. 1.13 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Mid-American Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 5th place is 4.50, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 4.50 x 1.00 = 1.13 points

1995/96

NCAA - Mid-American Conference 1995/96 with Western Michigan Univ. 0.80 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Mid-American Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 8th place is 3.20, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 3.20 x 1.00 = 0.80 points

1994/95

NCAA - Mid-American Conference 1994/95 with Western Michigan Univ. 0.80 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Mid-American Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 8th place is 3.20, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 3.20 x 1.00 = 0.80 points

1993/94

NCAA - Southland Conference 1993/94 with UT Arlington 1.25 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Southland Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 4th place is 5.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 5.00 x 1.00 = 1.25 points

1992/93

NCAA - Southland Conference 1992/93 with UT Arlington 2.50 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Southland Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 10.00 x 1.00 = 2.50 points

1991/92

NCAA - Southland Conference 1991/92 with UT Arlington 2.00 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Southland Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 2nd place is 8.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 8.00 x 1.00 = 2.00 points

1990/91

NCAA - Southland Conference 1990/91 with UT Arlington 2.50 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Southland Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 10.00 x 1.00 = 2.50 points

NCAA 1990/91 with UT Arlington 4.20 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 1.00 = 4.20 points

1989/90

NCAA - Southland Conference 1989/90 with UT Arlington 2.50 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA - Southland Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.25 x 10.00 x 1.00 = 2.50 points

NCAA 1989/90 with UT Arlington 18.00 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 3.00 x 6.00 x 1.00 = 18.00 points

1988/89

NCAA II 1988/89 with North Dakota State Univ. 2.40 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA II has rank 0.40 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.40 x 6.00 x 1.00 = 2.40 points

1987/88

NCAA II 1987/88 with North Dakota State Univ. 1.80 points to ranking

Tournament NCAA II has rank 0.40 ratio for 5th place is 4.50, ratio for head coach is 1.00, so 0.40 x 4.50 x 1.00 = 1.80 points

Are you Cathy George?

Take over the profile

0