Tournament NCAA - Southeastern Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 2.90 x 0.75 = 2.18 points
Tournament NCAA - Southeastern Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 4th place is 5.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 5.00 x 0.75 = 3.75 points
33
NCAA 2016/17
with Texas A&M Univ. 0.16 points to ranking
Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 33th place is 0.07, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 0.07 x 0.75 = 0.16 points
Tournament NCAA - Southeastern Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 10.00 x 0.75 = 7.50 points
17
NCAA 2015/16
with Texas A&M Univ. 3.15 points to ranking
Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 0.75 = 3.15 points
Tournament NCAA - Southeastern Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 5th place is 4.50, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 4.50 x 0.75 = 3.38 points
33
NCAA 2014/15
with Texas A&M Univ. 0.16 points to ranking
Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 33th place is 0.07, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 0.07 x 0.75 = 0.16 points
Tournament NCAA - Southeastern Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 7th place is 3.60, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 3.60 x 0.75 = 2.70 points
17
NCAA 2013/14
with Texas A&M Univ. 3.15 points to ranking
Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 0.75 = 3.15 points
Tournament NCAA - Southeastern Conference has rank 1.00 ratio for 2nd place is 8.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 1.00 x 8.00 x 0.75 = 6.00 points
17
NCAA 2012/13
with Texas A&M Univ. 3.15 points to ranking
Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 0.75 = 3.15 points
Tournament NORCECA Championship U20 has rank 2.00 ratio for 1st place is 10.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 2.00 x 10.00 x 0.75 = 15.00 points
Tournament NCAA - Big West Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 7th place is 3.60, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 0.25 x 3.60 x 0.75 = 0.68 points
17
NCAA 1989/90
with San Jose State Univ. 3.15 points to ranking
Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 0.75 = 3.15 points
1988/89
17
NCAA 1988/89
with San Jose State Univ. 3.15 points to ranking
Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 17th place is 1.40, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 1.40 x 0.75 = 3.15 points
Tournament NCAA - Big West Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 7th place is 3.60, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 0.25 x 3.60 x 0.75 = 0.68 points
1987/88
9
NCAA 1987/88
with San Jose State Univ. 6.53 points to ranking
Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 2.90 x 0.75 = 6.53 points
Tournament NCAA - Big West Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 0.25 x 6.00 x 0.75 = 1.13 points
Tournament NCAA - Big West Conference has rank 0.25 ratio for 3rd place is 6.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 0.25 x 6.00 x 0.75 = 1.13 points
9
NCAA 1986/87
with San Jose State Univ. 6.53 points to ranking
Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 2.90 x 0.75 = 6.53 points
1985/86
9
NCAA 1985/86
with San Jose State Univ. 6.53 points to ranking
Tournament NCAA has rank 3.00 ratio for 9th place is 2.90, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 3.00 x 2.90 x 0.75 = 6.53 points
Tournament FISU World University Games has rank 2.00 ratio for 6th place is 4.00, ratio for coach assistant is 0.75, so 2.00 x 4.00 x 0.75 = 6.00 points